This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
The EAT has upheld an employment tribunal’s decision that a relocation of three and a half miles following a TUPE transfer was not a substantial change to bus drivers’ working conditions to their material detriment. The employees were therefore not entitled to claim that they had been constructively dismissed or dismissed for the purposes of regulation 4(9) of TUPE 2006.
This decision may be seen as beneficial to employers since it suggests that the material detriment test for employees to overcome to satisfy a regulation 4(9) claim may be higher than previously thought.
Disclaimer
This article is © Endeavour Partnership LLP 2014 and may not be reproduced without our express permission.
This article is a general summary and should not be relied upon in the place of seeking professional advice in respect of any specific situation.
No responsibility can be accepted for any actions based on the information in this article.
Share this post: